thanks geert,
this really did work! i was reluctant on experimenting with a 2nd
document call just out of this reason, but so far the performance
backlash it does not really show.
greetings
jan
On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 00:08:37 +0100, Geert Josten
<geert(_dot_)josten(_at_)daidalos(_dot_)nl> wrote:
Hi Jan,
Haven't worked through your code completely, but at least the following
caught my eye:
> <xsl:apply-templates
select="site:children/site:document">
> <xsl:sort
select="navi:order"/><!--does not work-->
> </xsl:apply-templates>
This suggests that navi:order is a subelement of site:document, which I
believe is not the case...
Changing the sort to:
<xsl:sort select="document(site:xml-file)/*/navi:order"/>
is more likely to work...
But I think you'd better try to get the document function call into the
select statement of the
apply-templates or a for-each if necessary. I have a hunch that it is a
performance killer this way.
But then again, only one way to found out...
G.
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail:
<mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--
Jan
http://www.limpens.com
Otakoo Saloon Cartoon - newest episode at http://limpens.com/oscredirect
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--