Quoting Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>:
So why not have two schemas from the XSLT 2.0 WG: the current one with
all bells and whistles and a much simpler one that will be easily and
immediately dropable in most of today's not so clever schema-oriented
text editors?
What is the intended purpose of the schema in current XSLT 2.0 Draft? Is it
validation of stylesheets? Or is it providing a simple way to implement entry
helpers for XML editors? Or feeding as an input for source generators
(XML Data
Binding)?
There are numerous products which are great although the Schema support is not
complete. Complete support is good of course, but mostly not the main focus of
development.
In my opinion a much simpler schema would be great. But it would be
difficult to
decide what to leave out. But the thing with complexContent inside a
SimpleType
might be a good candidat. ;)
Regards,
Peter Gerstbach
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--