Wendell: I'm very excited... will give this a whirl tomorrow.
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 00:03:38 +0000, Aron Bock <aronbock(_at_)hotmail(_dot_)com>
wrote:
Wendell, if this works (heheh) it's very cool! It inspires me to learn
about XSL's "built-in" set operations capabilities.
--A
From: Wendell Piez <wapiez(_at_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
Reply-To: xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
To: xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: [xsl] Tricky inclusion match
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:26:06 -0500
Karl,
It turned out that keys weren't actually necessary: as posed (as I
understand it) the colors problem could be solved with a simple (if not
obvious) test. But using a key does make it slightly more efficient:
_________________________________________________________________
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail:
<mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--