Check out this post from back in December >
http://www.xsltblog.com/archives/2004/12/xslscript_revis_1.html
There are plenty of projects out there that have attempted to bring a
more simplified, procedural style syntax that then compiles into the
proper XSLT syntax that it is representative as part of a process
invoked fromt the command line. PaulT's XSLScript is probably the one
that most people tend to think of when they think of XSLT "scripting"
languages but as some of the commentors point out there are definitely
several others, at least.
On 21 Apr 2005 20:10:09 +0100, Colin Paul Adams
<colin(_at_)colina(_dot_)demon(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk> wrote:
"Michael" == Michael Kay <mike(_at_)saxonica(_dot_)com> writes:
Michael> Personally, I can never remember what all the symbols on
Michael> the diagrams actually mean:
Tool-tips give the game away here - what's the point of graphical
symbols, when you need a textual reminder as to what they mean.
Michael> other people seem to like them so it must just be me.
No - you are not alone!
--
Colin Paul Adams
Preston Lancashire
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail:
<mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--
<M:D/>
:: M. David Peterson ::
XML & XML Transformations, C#, .NET, and Functional Languages Specialist
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--