That'd be great, Jirka, but Nadia is using FOP (if I recall correctly),
and the current version of FOP only supports keeps on tables.
Jay Bryant
Bryant Communication Services
(presently consulting at Synergistic Solution Technologies)
Jirka Kosek <jirka(_at_)kosek(_dot_)cz>
04/21/2005 10:59 AM
Please respond to
xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
To
xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
cc
Subject
Re: [xsl] Total number of pages with XSL-FO
JBryant(_at_)s-s-t(_dot_)com wrote:
From a few messages ago:
--------------------------------------------------------
If you want to be absolutely sure that content appears on the last page,
put the last block that has content and the empty block into a table
that
has two rows (one for each block). Then set keep-with-next="always" on
the
first row. That way, the empty block can never be on a page by itself.
--------------------------------------------------------
Wouldn't it be easier to do just:
<fo:block id="last-page" line-height="0" keep-with-previous="always"/>
There will not be need to surround last block in document with the
table. (I'm assuming that FO processor supports keep-with-next, which is
not case for FOP.)
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka(_at_)kosek(_dot_)cz http://www.kosek.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
Profesionální školení a poradenství v oblasti technologií XML.
Podívejte se na náš nově spuštěný web http://DocBook.cz
Podrobný přehled školení http://xmlguru.cz/skoleni/
------------------------------------------------------------------
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--