-Does the SA processor require a source schema for every
transform (when
using schema-element() etc)?
No, a schema-aware processor can handle both typed and
untyped input documents.
Is it the case that a schema-aware processor processing an untyped input
document behaves the same as a non-SA processor on that document?
For example, I could use Saxon 8.4SA with my current stylesheets and
(currently) untyped source and I would get the same output as using
Saxon 8.4B?
(I'm trying to rule out any reasons for choosing 8.4B over 8.4SA)
-Is it possible to store the validated source (the PSVI?)
and supply
that for subsequent transforms?
Watch this space....
I think that's the clincher at the moment.
Other than the 2.0 spec, are there any good resources out
there for SA
processing?
There's a chapter in my book, but it was written before I had
any real practical experience to share. So the answer is,
very little. I've been meaning for a while to write some
articles on the subject. I have given a few talks (the next
one is in Prague on Saturday, but I think they're
full...)
(I'm in Prague this weekend too, but on a friends stag do - small world
isn't it?)
I have your books but as you say the chapter on SA processing doesn't
have many real world examples. Those articles or lecture notes would be
useful...
cheers
andrew
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--