and a company with a
large amount of XSLT 1.0 code might be very reluctant to move to XSLT 2.0,
and I wouldn't blame them.
we're not switching yet-a-while, checking that 78,000 lines of xslt1
does the same thing when executed in an xslt2 processor is not a job
you'd want to do while there is still chance of the spec changing (or
being shelved to join xslt 1.1). Although personally I may have cast an
eye over the xslt2 spec, so we know what's coming up...
David
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--