Quick question about result tree fragments, having nothing to do with
extension "node-set" functions :-)
I'm generating XHTML from the XML spat out by a content management system.
Various pieces of content are passed to templates as parameters, not all
of which may be present: for example, an interview is just a bunch of
pargraphs, while a movie review also has links to external websites. So I
have templates like:
<xsl:template match"block">
<xsl:param name="contentRTF"></xsl:param>
<xsl:param name="linksRTF"></xsl:param>
<div class="article">
<xsl:copy-of select="contentRTF" />
<xsl:copy-of select="linksRTF" />
</div>
</xsl:template>
What do people think is the "best" way of specifying the default value for
the parameters:
<xsl:param name="contentRTF"></xsl:param>
which gives a RTF containing nothing, or
<xsl:param name="contentRTF" select="" />
which gives an empty nodeset (or something),or even
<xsl:param name="contentRTF select="''" />
which gives an empty string.
I appreciate that, for all practical purposes, I should get the same
output from all of them, but was wondering which might be seen as the
canonical way of doing it, given that any *passed* value will always be a
result tree fragment. Must have my strong-typing head on today :-)
Any thoughts?
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--