At 10:01 PM +0100 10/12/05, Michael Kay wrote:
Firstly, it doesn't make all that much difference since there are copies
elsewhere on the web:
http://www.stylusstudio.com/xsllist/
But keep it. History is good.
My first post is pretty embarrassing with hindsight, but it was early days:
http://www.stylusstudio.com/xsllist/199802/post60020.html
After all, Paul Grosso was telling us that they didn't want to have to make
XSL namespace-aware:
http://www.stylusstudio.com/xsllist/199802/post10020.html
The fact that you point to one of the unofficial archives really says
it all; I COULDN'T edit the record if I wanted to. Since the question
is moot, and since everyone who has responded agrees that we should
keep the whole archive, that's what we'll do.
-- Tommie
--
======================================================================
B. Tommie Usdin
mailto:btusdin(_at_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com
17 West Jefferson Street Phone: 301/315-9631
Suite 207 Direct Line: 301/315-9634
Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in XML and SGML
======================================================================
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--