To me it seems potentially full of confusion. Why on earth re-use an
existing term with a completely different meaning (URI reference),
when the term IRI -reference already exists with the required meaning?
It's traditional usage of "URI" in XML-land though isn't it?
Eg the xml spec itself says....
System identifiers (and other XML strings meant to be used as URI
references) MAY contain characters that, according to [IETF RFC 2396]
and [IETF RFC 2732], must be escaped before a URI can be used to
retrieve the referenced resource.
David
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--