xsl-list
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: second implementation of XSLT 2.0?

2005-11-28 06:28:20
At 11/23/2005 07:29 AM, Elliotte Harold wrote:

The W3C has never been the best organization for test suites and 
interoperability. For instance they do not require even one complete 
implementation before advancing to REC, only that each feature be 
independently implemented. It is possible for a W3C spec to be 
actively self-contradictory as long as different implementations 
implement different internally consistent subsets.

Wednesday, November 23, 2005 12:16 PM, Jim Melton wrote:

So, your assertion has been disproven by providing a single contrary 
example.  Gratuitous criticisms are unwarranted, especially when 
untrue. 

You might want to read the second paragraph of Elliotte's two-paragraph
posting before quoting his first paragraph out of context and accusing
him of making untrue, gratuitous criticism.

Bob DuCharme

--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>