At 11/23/2005 07:29 AM, Elliotte Harold wrote:
...
The W3C has never been the best organization for test suites and
interoperability. For instance they do not require even one complete
implementation before advancing to REC, only that each feature be
independently implemented. It is possible for a W3C spec to be actively
self-contradictory as long as different implementations implement
different internally consistent subsets.
Not so. It's dangerous to make broad generalizations, particularly when
the maker is not part of the environment about which the generalizations
are being made.
"They" are not a uniform, homogenous mass. "They" are instead a diverse
bunch of Working Groups, each of which has to follow the W3C guidelines and
directives (the Process Document), but that have flexibility that enables
them to develop more stringent criteria than the Process Document requires.
For example, the XML Query WG has developed, not only a pretty
comprehensive test suite, but requirements for exiting the Candidate
Recommendation stage that include "at least two implementations of each
individual feature", but also "at least two distinct implementations" of
Minimal XQuery (which, despite the name, is the entire suite of
specifications except for the seven optional features), "at least one of
which uses the XQuery human-readable syntax defined in this specification,
and at least one of which uses the XQueryX XML syntax defined in
[XQueryX]". (You can read this for yourselves in the CR document of
XQuery, located at http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery/#status.)
So, your assertion has been disproven by providing a single contrary
example. Gratuitous criticisms are unwarranted, especially when untrue.
Hope this helps,
Jim
========================================================================
Jim Melton --- Editor of ISO/IEC 9075-* (SQL) Phone: +1.801.942.0144
Co-Chair, W3C XML Query WG; F&O (etc.) editor Fax : +1.801.942.3345
Oracle Corporation Oracle Email: jim dot melton at oracle dot com
1930 Viscounti Drive Standards email: jim dot melton at acm dot org
Sandy, UT 84093-1063 USA Personal email: jim at melton dot name
========================================================================
= Facts are facts. But any opinions expressed are the opinions =
= only of myself and may or may not reflect the opinions of anybody =
= else with whom I may or may not have discussed the issues at hand. =
========================================================================
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--