Before a W3C Candidate Recommendation advances to Proposed
Recommendation status, "the Working Group should be able to demonstrate
two interoperable implementations of each feature."[1] So far, we've got
Saxon for 2.0, but what else? A week ago I posted a message on the
Xalan-J user list to see if anyone knew anything about schedules or
stages of XSLT 2.0 support in Xalan, and I got no reply. I've recently
learned that XML Spy is advertising XSLT 2.0 support[2]; does anyone
know if they wrote their own engine and how good it is?
thanks,
Bob DuCharme
[1] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process-20010719/tr.html#RecsCR
[2] http://www.altova.com/features_xsl.html
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--