xsl-list
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: second implementation of XSLT 2.0?

2005-11-29 22:54:26
On 11/23/05, Jim Melton <jim(_dot_)melton(_at_)acm(_dot_)org> wrote:
At 11/23/2005 07:29 AM, Elliotte Harold wrote:


Not so.  It's dangerous to make broad generalizations, particularly when
the maker is not part of the environment about which the generalizations
are being made.


Actually, as dangerous as you suggest it to be the generalizations are
quite easy to make when your someone like Elliotte and have a keen
understanding of both the process, the technology, and the politics
involved in such environments.

You're not as much of a mystery as you seem to suggest.

Oh, and I not only fully back Bob's comments but would add to them
that you really should avoid coming across as a snotty know it all
that 'mingles' with the common folk only when it seems necessary to
place them in proper pecking order.  I don't know who you are and as
such I am not saying this with some sort of vengeance... I simply read
your comments and began to laugh at the level of arrogance that was
portrayed.

Sorry, insult my friends colleagues and I will ensure they know that I
stand behind them 100% as the work they do is a lot more significant
than it seems you realize.

--
<M:D/>

M. David Peterson
http://www.xsltblog.com
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>