But after the recommendation, it seems it's not possible:
I think after using xslt most days since the earliest drafts of xslt 1
I've used most parts of the language multiple times, but I've never used
attribute sets, which have always seems rather useless to me.
Instead of an attribute set you can use a named template that consists
of a sequence of xsl:attribute statements. It is far more flexible.
<xsl:template name="my.set">
<xsl:attribute name="attr">value</xsl:attribute>
</xsl:template>
<literal-res-elem>
<xsl:if test="@condition">
<xsl:call-template name="my.set"/>
</xsl:if>
</literal-res-elem>
David
________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--