----- Original Message -----
From: "Nick Fitzsimons" <nick(_at_)nickfitz(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk>
To: <xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 8:16 PM
Subject: Re: [xsl] Transform xml to html
Joe Fawcett wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "andrew welch" On 3/10/06, Anthony
Ettinger <aettinger(_at_)sdsualumni(_dot_)org> wrote:
<pre>? ouch.
Care to expand on that one... or is it too painful?
Yes please let us know what's so bad about it.
I know it's deprecated as well as XMP but what's the alternative and why
are they so bad?
Joe
You'll be pleased to hear that <pre> isn't deprecated, not even in XHTML
2.0:
<http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml2/mod-structural.html#edef_structural_pre>
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
Thanks. I believe that they must have meant "not to be used as a way of
displaying code".
Next time I'll check myself :)
--
Joe
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--