Colin Adams wrote:
His example stylesheets were 2.0, and so support for xml:base is
required for any processor.
Hmm, interesting. So, this means that xml:base ought to be interpreted.
Any ideas how that might work? I tried some combinations, but never saw
any effect of the xml:base attribute :S
-- Abel
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--