"David" == David Carlisle <davidc(_at_)nag(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk> writes:
>> This seems unambiguous to me, and therefore you can rely on it
>> working, subject to the stylesheet having a base URI.
David> No it's that"subject to" that I was refering to. If ther
--------
David> eis no base uri, then on teh face of it a relative URI of
--- ---
David> '' ought to have no base to resolve against but the olf URI
---
David> rfc at ;east had some words to teh efect that '' was
----- ---
David> special-cased as a same-document reference, which migt
----
David> imply it works even if there is no base.
Godo socre. Ptiy abuot hte lsat lnie. :-)
That's interesting - have the words been dropped in 3986?
When I read sections 4.4 and 5.1 in 3986, I think there might still be
a trace of the ambiguity.
Whatever, I agree with your conclusion that you cannot rely on
document ('') working.
--
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--