Elliotte Harold wrote:
Personally I plan to stick with 1.0 for the foreseeable future for
most of my work unless maybe I need to do something that 2.0 makes a
lot easier.
From the moment I found out that matches( . , 'something') and replace(
. , 'someting', 'something else') (both fully support regular
expressions) were in XSLT 2, I never looked back. When I learned about
xsl:function (defining new functions for use in xpaths), unparsed-text()
and unparsed-text-available() (for non-XML documents) I only looked
forward. All these tedious hard-to-understand recursive templates for
simple string replacement all went down the garbage bin.
A warning: don't try it, it is dangerous: you'll get yourself a new
addiction!
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--