Mukul Gandhi wrote:
On 1/23/07, Andrew Welch <andrew(_dot_)j(_dot_)welch(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
wrote:
Seriously though, it doesnt matter whether the browser supports it -
just run the transforms on your server for dynamic pages or offline
for static - let the browsers worry about rendering XHTML.
I think having XSLT 2.0 support on browser will be useful. Using XSLT
2.0 on server side is certainly an alternative. But for e.g., I just
have a plain HTTP Web Server with no Java support (Servlets, JSP etc),
then I can serve XML+XSLT to the browser, and the browser can do the
transformation.
I agree: think of all those AJAX applications transforming SOAP/REST XML
to HTML that could benefit from XSLT 2.0
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--