hello.
- about the element() scheme being required:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xinclude/#xml-included-items
section 4.2: [...]
third-last paragraph: "XPointers of the forms described in [XPointer
Framework] and [XPointer element() scheme] must be supported."
- about the problem testing ft-include2.xsl (by which i think you mean
ft-include2.x*m*l):
this works for me, resulting in ultimately including include1.xml. i am
using saxonsa-8.8j. what are you using? i found that all xslt 2.0
implementations other than saxon which i have tried so far are highly
unsatisfactory in terms of implementation quality (and i am not
affiliated with saxonica in any way).
if possible, please cc be on mails to the list, because i am not
subscribed to receive all posts individually.
thanks for your feedback and kind regards,
erik wilde tel:+1-510-6432253 - fax:+1-510-6425814
dret(_at_)berkeley(_dot_)edu - http://dret.net/netdret
UC Berkeley - School of Information (iSchool)
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--