unless Saxon performs some smart optimization. What do you think ?
even if you don't use a key saxon (perhaps just in the -sa version, I
can't remember) may decide you use some //foo[(_at_)x='aa'] idiom often
enough to internally use a key anyway. I tend to think of for-each group
as a sane syntax added at xslt2 for the muenchian grouping idiom that
Dimitre showed, which works well, but only looks normal as its posted
once a week for over half a decade to this list:-). No idea if the
internal implementations are similar though but that's processor
specific detail...
David
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--