Colin Adams wrote:
First, I think that your statement that we have only 2 major XSLT 2.0
processors is incorrect. I fail to see how Gestalt is less major than
Altova.
I will include it.
In gestalt, the collection function currently only accepts a file: URI which
must be a legitimate file URI
pointing to a directory. All files in this directory that sucessfully parse
as xml create a document node in the directory.
If your proper documentation for Gestalt has something of interest for
the collection() function, I will link to it.
Secondly, it would be better in your example to change the template with
match="/" to one with name="initial". Asking the user to supply a dummy
document is senseless.
As far as I know name="initial" is only a method some processors
support and only from the command line or from other code. When
testing, many people just use an XML Editor?
I will see if can improve my text.
Cheers,
Jesper Tverskov
http://www.xmlplease.com/xslt
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--