Instead of Muenchian, if you really *have* to stick to XSLT 1.0,
^^^^^^^^
The Muenchian method is defined and used with XSLT 1.0, why users who
have to stick to XSLT 1.0 should not use it?
In this particular case, I think that the tree-walking algorithm suits better
than the Muenchian grouping method with keys (which may yield an interesting
discussion on its own). Someone did come up with a good tree walking solution,
not sure if a similar thing with Muenchian would be equally easy/hard (I'll
leave the comparison of the two for this case to others).
P.S.
Abel, I tried to reach you via email, probably do not have your
correct email address.
I see it now. It got filed in the xsl archive instead in my normal inbox.
Answer underway ;)
Cheers,
-- Abel Braaksma
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--