On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:47:48 -0600, Wendell Piez <wapiez(_at_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
wrote:
I also think you have a point that there's really no way of knowing how
much client-side XSLT processing is happening.
Obviously not very scientific, but we should be able to at least derive
some generalized figures via,
http://www.google.com/search?q=filetype:xsl+%22document(%22 = 21,100
http://www.google.com/search?q=filetype:xslt+%22document(%22 = 30,300
http://www.google.com/search?q=filetype%3Axslt+OR+filetype%3Axsl = 363,000
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=%3C%3Fxml-stylesheet =
423,000
http://www.google.com/search?q=%3C%3Fxml-stylesheet+filetype%3Axml = 13,200
http://www.google.com/search?q=%3C%3Fxml-stylesheet+type%3D%22text%2Fxsl%22
= 196,000
Of course what good are numbers if they can't be compared to something
else to provide proper context/perspective,
http://www.google.com/search?q=%3Cscript+type%3D%22text%2Fjavascript%22+filetype%3Ahtml
= 1,450,000
... which if you ask me it seems a bit much to assume there are only
1,450,000 documents with an html filetype in which contain the string
<script type="text/javascript", so I think we can safely assume that the
above numbers represent a small fraction of the total number of XML and/or
XSLT documents that contain the various strings suggested above that are
accessible to Googles crawlers.
--
/M:D
M. David Peterson
http://mdavid.name | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354 |
http://dev.aol.com/blog/3155
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--