Re: [xsl] In Search of People Who Know About and/or Use the Document Fun

On Thu, 06 Sep 2007 23:37:39 -0600, Colin Paul Adams  
<colin(_at_)colina(_dot_)demon(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk> wrote:
> I am not talking about compiling to .NET - this would give very bad
> performance -
In comparison to?

Being the slowest browser-based XSLT 2.0 processor only matters when there  
are other browser-based XSLT 2.0 processors to compare yourself against.   
And in the mean time being the first browser-based XSLT 2.0 processor  
means that, regardless of its native counter part, Gestalt would be the  
fastest browser-based XSLT 2.0 processor, and everyone else would be  
playing catch-up.
In other words,

> this would give very bad
> performance
In comparison to?

--
/M:D

M. David Peterson
http://mdavid.name | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354 |  
http://dev.aol.com/blog/3155
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--