On 19/10/2007, Florent Georges <lists(_at_)fgeorges(_dot_)org> wrote:
Andrew Welch wrote:
Hi
you're stuck with the for-each... perhaps (depending on what
else you use it for) it should be typed as element()+ and
then you could use the slash operator.
If you are sure they will be nodes, just use node()+. If you want to
be able to use atomic strings as well, you'll have to use the for each.
Hi Florent,
I suppose if they are <code> elements and you want to be as
restrictive as possible, it should really be "element(code)+"...
although I don't often put the element names in, probably because it
seems a bit pointless when the select statement selects only those
nodes eg
select="//code" as="element(code)+"
If it does offer any benefits over just element()+ in that case it
would be interesting to know...
cheers
--
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com
Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--