Michael Kay wrote:
But that's not a performance issue, and nor are most of the points
Abel made; and I have to say I couldn't see anything at all
here that
should cause performance problems.
Not even the recursion?
There's nothing intrinsically inefficient about recursion. As far as I could
see, the process here was linear. Sibling recursion can lead to stack
overflow if the number of siblings is high, but that doesn't make it slow. I
looked hard at this to see if there was any non-linearity, but if there is,
I couldn't find it.
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--