>> I then tried it on Saxon 9. It reports error XTSE0210, so I
>> guess Dr. Kay is ignoring the fragment identifier for the
>> purposes of XTSE0210. I guess it can be argued either way with
>> that wording, and perhaps it is deliberately ambiguous. The
>> main point is that you don't get an infinite recursion whilst
>> compiling.
I just realized that ignoring the fragment identifier is actually
safer (or at least easier).
Consider:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xsl:stylesheet version="2.0"
xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform"
xml:id="me"
<xsl:import href="#me" />
</xsl:stylesheet>
Saxon reports error XTSE0210 whereas Gestalt goes into an infinite
loop.
So in order to be conformant, Gestalt has somehow to check that the
fragment identifier does not refer to a module already in action.
I shall have to consider how to do this.
--
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--