On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 04:08:14PM +0100, Andrew Welch wrote:
On 18/04/2008, Liam Quin <liam(_at_)w3(_dot_)org> wrote:
[...]
The point worth mentioning is that with custom extensions you are
tying yourself to a particular processor anyway - and sometimes to a
particular version. Given that version you have a fair understanding
of the order of execution, so I think you could expect certain
behaviour happy in the knowledge that your code isn't portable and
even it was might not behave the same on a different processor.
Here we agree.
Liam
--
Liam Quin, W3C XML Activity Lead, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
http://www.holoweb.net/~liam/ * http://www.fromoldbooks.org/
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--