On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 16:53:37 -0600, Michael Kay <mike(_at_)saxonica(_dot_)com>
wrote:
If we need XSLT 2.0 processors that cover gaps in the market, then we may
have to be prepared to pay for them.
+1
Also, and/or be willing to pay for tooling that supports the development
of the "free" processor. e.g. VS.NET sales justify the development of
technologies you get for "free" via the .NET platform.
--
/M:D
M. David Peterson
Co-Founder & Chief Architect, 3rd&Urban, LLC
Email: m(_dot_)david(_at_)3rdandUrban(_dot_)com |
m(_dot_)david(_at_)amp(_dot_)fm
Mobile: (206) 999-0588
http://3rdandUrban.com | http://amp.fm |
http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--