aren't FO specific questions like asking XHTML specific
questions
Actually XSL-FO is on topic by definition of XSL List:
http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list/
There is no restriction to what may be posted on the
XSL-List provided it is related to XSL, which is
considered to include XSLT (versions 1 and 2), XPath
(versions 1 and 2) and XSL Formatting Objects (FO).
Sure, but really, what does FO have to do with XSLT - other than
distant history and similarities in the name?
You could argue that XML Schema has a lot more to do with 2.0, so
maybe that could be added to the definition...
(just making observations, there are only a handful of FO posts each
year anyway)
--
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com
Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--