Richard Light wrote:
Hi
it seems to me that it would be useful if XSLT processors could
specify in the document() function that what they want is, for
example, application/rdf+xml. Then they could be served the RDF
version of a Semantic Web resource, rather than the HTML "human-
readable" version.
If you want to do that for HTTP accesses (I think that can be
achieved by an HTTP header), and if you are using Saxon, you can use my
HTTP extension for Saxon:
http://www.fgeorges.org/xslt/saxon-ext/
(will be updated soon, in particular the examples).
Regards,
--drkm
_____________________________________________________________________________
Envoyez avec Yahoo! Mail. Une boite mail plus intelligente http://mail.yahoo.fr
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--