Hi Mike,
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Michael Kay <mike(_at_)saxonica(_dot_)com>
wrote:
read the file; but writing an extension function is no more work and equally
(non-)portable.
An idea was occurring in my mind since quite some time. Can we
standardise the namespaces of extension mechanisms (at least for Java)
in XSLT (perhaps in versions after XSLT 2.0) ? I guess it won't be
much effort for different products to comply, and would bring
standardization in this area also.
Would be great if you could consider this proposal in the XSL WG.
--
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--