<Geert(_dot_)Josten(_at_)daidalos(_dot_)nl> wrote:
>> It isn't very explicit about why the default namespace does not
>> apply to attributes, though. And > indeed REC-xml-names itself
>> neither.
Mukul> my personal opinion is,
Mukul> that identity of attributes is bound to it's containing
Mukul> element, so this rule seems ok to me.
And I think the is the official position to.
So you only have to add a prefix to the attribute if it's
identity belongs elsewhere.
...
--
Colin Adams
It sounded too simple at first though, but at second though it does sound quite
natural indeed. Why look for a harder answer when a simple one satisfies...
Thanks for bearing with me!
Kind regards,
Geert
Drs. G.P.H. Josten
Consultant
http://www.daidalos.nl/
Daidalos BV
Source of Innovation
Hoekeindsehof 1-4
2665 JZ Bleiswijk
Tel.: +31 (0) 10 850 1200
Fax: +31 (0) 10 850 1199
http://www.daidalos.nl/
KvK 27164984
De informatie - verzonden in of met dit emailbericht - is afkomstig van
Daidalos BV en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit
bericht onbedoeld hebt ontvangen, verzoeken wij u het te verwijderen. Aan dit
bericht kunnen geen rechten worden ontleend.
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--