Michael --
So you're saying that you prefer
<xsl:template match="*">
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:copy-of select="@*"/>
<xsl:apply-templates select="node()"/>
</xsl:copy>
</xsl:template>
to
<xsl:template match="@*|*">
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:apply-templates select="@*|node()"/>
</xsl:copy>
</xsl:template>
for the cases where attribute processing is minimal, right? May I ask
if that is because it's more efficient, more elegant, more XSLT-ish,
or just personal preference?
Thanks!
-- Syd, who always uses:
<xsl:template match="@*|node()">
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:apply-templates select="@*|node()"/>
</xsl:copy>
</xsl:template>
Note, I generally use the element-only form of identity template
rather than the elements-and-attributes form in the common case
where all existing attributes are to be copied to the output,
without exception: or, as here, where the exception is easily
accommodated.
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--