Michael --
So you're saying that you prefer
<xsl:template match="*">
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:copy-of select="@*"/>
<xsl:apply-templates select="node()"/>
</xsl:copy>
</xsl:template>
to
<xsl:template match="@*|*">
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:apply-templates select="@*|node()"/>
</xsl:copy>
</xsl:template>
for the cases where attribute processing is minimal, right?
May I ask if that is because it's more efficient, more
elegant, more XSLT-ish, or just personal preference?
A bit of each. It just seems over-engineered to do rule-based processing of
attributes when every attribute is processed in exactly the same way.
Regards,
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
http://twitter.com/michaelhkay
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--