On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Dimitre Novatchev
<dnovatchev(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
The use of an <xsl:function> to produce content is simple:
<xsl:sequence select="my:foo(bar)"/>
sure. but can something like following, be simulated with XPath 2
function calls?
<xsl:variable name="x">
<xsl:call-template ... />
</xsl:variable>
I think, we cannot.
Didn't you know that <xsl:apply-templates> can be used in pull-style
processing? Modes and uniquely namespaced nodes should light a bulb :)
I am not sure, if that's entirely correct. Working on
xsl:apply-templates with modes looks to me semi pull style, and not a
pull style in entirety!
Anyone (who hasn't already come to this conclusion) can find all facts
and conclude that the following is not needed:
That gives me kind of a laugh :)
My suggestions, may not be entirely correct from design point of view.
But saying, that I am entirely wrong, amuses me (my proposal is still
a XSLT 2.x feature design discussion!) :)
--
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--