Re: [xsl] Nicer way to change context-node than xsl:for-each ?

Mukul Gandhi wrote:

  Hi,

> I guess, xsl:call-template is retained in XSLT 2.0 due to
> backward compatibility with XSLT 1.
  Named templates and functions are not the same beasts.  The first difference 
that come to my mind is that the sequence ctor of a function is always 
evaluated in temporary output state.

  But true, for some usages (a lot of usage, for a right definition of "a lot") 
a function can be used instead of a named template.

  Regards,

-- 
Florent Georges
http://www.fgeorges.org/
























--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--