On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 5:19 PM, <russurquhart1(_at_)verizon(_dot_)net> wrote:
I used contains because filter could have the value
filter="filter1,filter10,filter2" and i thought having a @filter='filter1'
would fail for the previous string. If that is not the case, i'll change it,
but i thought i tried that one time and it didn't work.
No you are right, @filter="filter1" would fail. That's one reason why
I suggested cleaning up the attribute value syntax, then you could use
something like
contains(concat(normalize-space(@filter), " "), "filter1 ")
Note the space after 'filter1' -- that prevents it from matching
"filter11". But this only works if you get rid of those commas.
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--