XSLTers don't seem to have drunk the pattern kool-aid to the extent that
Java and, it now seems, C++ programmers have, though I did get a similar
question about XSL-FO patterns a week or so ago at my XML Summer School
session on XSLT and XSL-FO.
13-or-so years of XSL-List hasn't crystallised into a set of standard
patterns AFAICT (and Meunchian grouping for XSLT 1.0 was probably the
closest we came to a standard pattern).
A few spring to mind - the identity transform, sibling recursion,
specific-imports-common, micro-pipelining etc.
--
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--