Will there be an open source version of Saxon covering 3.0 Michael,
presumably the HE variant?
No decisions yet. I will wait to see what happens in terms of
conformance profiles, whether there is a natural subdivision of the spec
that maps to product levels. I agree it's important to enable the
non-paying part of the community to move forward, as they have a lot of
influence on uptake.
I'm also keeping my options open in terms of support for 2.0 in future
product releases (other than as a subset of 3.0). At present you only
get 3.0 features if you explicitly ask, but it's becoming a bit of a
pain maintaining two modes of operation, especially minor details like
format-date() returning different error codes depending on whether 3.0
is enabled.
Michael Kay
Saxonica
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--