I think Tommie says this well. But rather than focus on the
unsupported (and IMHO likely to be untrue) premise, I'd like to focus
for a moment on the question: "what are the chances of 3.0 being
adopted"?
My thoughts on this are
* while for users like me the advancements in 3.0 are way cool, but
not particularly important,
* for users like Google and Amazon who have *lots* of data, the
streaming capability of 3.0 will make it very attractive,
* users like Google and Amazon have money and resources, where users
like me don't,
* it's extremely likely that at least 1 major implementation (Saxon)
will support 3.0,
I think it pretty likely that 3.0 will have widespread adoption as a
programming language and for use server-side. I doubt it will have
any feet in-the-browser.
I also suspect that Schematron implementations may find using XSLT
3.0 a lot easier.
Anyway, I hope it does get adopted, and I hope there are
implementations that users like me can take advantage of. Kudos to
the WG. I'm looking forward to trying maps and @supress-indentation.
:-)
Since relatively few folks adopted 2.0, what do we think the
chances are of 3.0 being adopted?
Do you have some basis for that assertion? I have no measures of
what the world is doing with XSLT, but the micro-cosmos I see has
almost entirely moved to 2.0.
If there are some statistics on what specifications are being used
in what environments and in what numbers I would love to see them.
However, I don't really think it matters; an exciting technical
achievement is an exciting technical achievement. Period.
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--