Heh. You're quite right. Congratulations and yay for the new features,
especially the accumulators and catch-ability :)
I guess I was thinking of for example browsers being able to handle 2.0
features (which I don't think any can, can they?), but you're right of course,
lots of people are using it internally.
Michele
suitably chastened
-----Original Message-----
From: David Carlisle [mailto:davidc(_at_)nag(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 2:14 PM
To: xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: [xsl] New XSLT 3.0 Working Draft
On 10/07/2012 19:01, Michele R Combs wrote:
such a spoilsport:-) the correct response is "congratulations" or "interesting
new features"! or something:-)
Since relatively few folks adopted 2.0
How did you measure that? certainly almost all the traffic here has been
xslt2 for years. (One of the shocks of looking at the xslt questions on
stackoverflow where I look occasionally is that there is still there a tendency
towards XSLT 1 use, which I found rather shocking really.
Outside of a browser I'd not use xslt 1.
what do we think the chances are of 3.0 being adopted?
Crystal balls required for that bit...
David
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--