On 26/01/2013 20:58, Costello, Roger L. wrote:
Hi Folks,
I only know of one fully-compliant XSLT/XPath 3.0 processor -- SAXON.
The next release of Saxon will, I hope, have complete coverage of the
XPath 3.0 candidate recommendation. But full conformance with XSLT 3.0
is still some way off.
And it's not free.
Are there any free, fully-compliant XSLT/XPath 3.0 processors?
I believe that it is important there be at least one free, fully-compliant
XSLT/XPath 3.0 processor.
Here's why: The people I work with think along these lines...
Yes, you're right, a lot of people are looking for a free lunch. I'm
glad you've realised this, and will now devote the next three years of
your life to feeding their hunger.
Michael Kay
Saxonica
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--