On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 18:33 -0800, Dimitre Novatchev wrote:
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Liam R E Quin <liam(_at_)w3(_dot_)org> wrote:
On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 13:52 -0800, Dimitre Novatchev wrote:
Would anyone seriously recommend using such a solution?
There are no works of humankind that cannot be broken,
yet humankind continues to use those works and to flourish.
Completely agreed.
[...]
All that is taking place is attempting to improve this work and to
make it more usable and doing what it says. Isn't this the main
purpose of publishing a draft of any W3C document, before it has
achieved the status of Recommendation?
Indeed it is, and constructive comments are very welcomed.
If you feel that the entire endeavour is futile, or that the approach is
fundamentally flawed, I invite you to file comments against the Last
Call Working Draft in bugzilla.
Best,
Liam
--
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org freenode/#xml
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--