XSL Discussion (date)
January 31, 2014
- Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Graydon, 18:11
- Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Ihe Onwuka, 15:31
- Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Dimitre Novatchev, 15:24
- Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Ihe Onwuka, 15:22
- Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Ihe Onwuka, 15:04
- Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Wendell Piez, 15:00
- Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Wendell Piez, 14:51
- Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Dimitre Novatchev, 14:50
- Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Wendell Piez, 14:41
- Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Ihe Onwuka, 14:37
- Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Dimitre Novatchev, 14:17
- Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Ihe Onwuka, 13:54
- Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Ihe Onwuka, 13:35
- Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Dimitre Novatchev, 13:35
- Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Ihe Onwuka, 13:29
- Re: [xsl] Preserving inline DTD, Wendell Piez, 11:59
- Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Dimitre Novatchev, 11:36
- Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Eliot Kimber, 11:21
- Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Wendell Piez, 11:16
- Re: [xsl] Re: [saxon] template match dependent on parent, Wendell Piez, 10:48
- Re: [xsl] Preserving inline DTD, Peter Flynn, 06:29
- Re: [xsl] Context node versus current streaming position, Michael Kay, 04:44
- [xsl] Context node versus current streaming position, Costello, Roger L., 04:34
- Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Ihe Onwuka, 01:22
January 30, 2014
- [xsl] Re: [saxon] template match dependent on parent, Ihe Onwuka, 22:41
- Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Ihe Onwuka, 21:02
- Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Ihe Onwuka, 20:40
- Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Dimitre Novatchev, 20:14
- Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Ihe Onwuka, 20:02
- Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex, 19:58
- Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Dimitre Novatchev, 19:54
- Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Ihe Onwuka, 19:09
- Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Ihe Onwuka, 19:03
- Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex, 18:52
- Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Dimitre Novatchev, 18:50
- Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex, 18:46
- Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Graydon, 18:46
- Re: [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Dimitre Novatchev, 18:39
- [xsl] Keys with duplicates should be simple, Ihe Onwuka, 18:19
- [xsl] [ANN] HTML5 and XML: a symposium, Tommie Usdin, 12:00
- Re: [xsl] Thanks for <xsl:iterate>, Michael Kay, 11:59
- Re: [xsl] Streaming terminology: Climbing, Michael Kay, 05:10
- RE: [xsl] Streaming terminology: Climbing, Costello, Roger L., 04:37
January 28, 2014
- [xsl] Thanks for <xsl:iterate>, David Sewell, 16:18
- Re: [xsl] Preserving inline DTD, Andrew Welch, 11:10
- Re: [xsl] Preserving inline DTD, Michael Kay, 11:05
- Re: [xsl] Preserving inline DTD, David Carlisle, 10:53
- RE: [xsl] Preserving inline DTD, Lizzi, Vincent, 10:31
- Re: [xsl] Preserving inline DTD, Wendell Piez, 08:41
- [xsl] [ANN] Release of Xmplify 1.4.0, Damian Morris, 04:21
January 23, 2014
- [xsl] Re: [xquery-talk] A Poor Man's XPROC, Ihe Onwuka, 16:24
- Re: [xsl] Using multiple xpath-default-namespace, Michael Kay, 10:19
- Re: [xsl] Using multiple xpath-default-namespace, Terry Badger, 07:30
- Re: [xsl] Using multiple xpath-default-namespace, Martin Honnen, 05:54
- [xsl] Using multiple xpath-default-namespace, Pankaj Chaturvedi, 05:43
January 16, 2014
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Dimitre Novatchev, 13:35
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Wendell Piez, 13:31
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Dimitre Novatchev, 10:58
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Wolfgang Laun, 10:23
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Michael Kay, 10:21
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Wendell Piez, 09:31
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, David Carlisle, 05:44
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Costello, Roger L., 04:39
January 15, 2014
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Michael Sokolov, 14:18
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Wendell Piez, 09:56
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Dimitre Novatchev, 09:13
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex, 05:27
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, David Carlisle, 05:21
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, David Carlisle, 05:17
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Costello, Roger L., 04:48
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, davep, 03:44
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Michael Kay, 02:28
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Graydon, 01:44
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, davep, 01:28
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Wolfgang Laun, 01:07
January 14, 2014
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Dimitre Novatchev, 16:58
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Michael Sokolov, 16:44
- [xsl] What?s next for the Print and Page Layout Community Grou p?, Tony Graham, 16:25
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Piotr Bański, 16:24
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Dimitre Novatchev, 16:08
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Piotr Bański, 15:49
- RE: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Costello, Roger L., 15:21
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Dimitre Novatchev, 14:34
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Michael Sokolov, 14:24
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Dimitre Novatchev, 14:12
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Michael Sokolov, 14:01
- [xsl] Balisage 2014 Call for Participation, Tommie Usdin, 11:35
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Dimitre Novatchev, 10:45
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Michael Kay, 09:42
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Wendell Piez, 09:24
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Dimitre Novatchev, 08:51
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Michael Kay, 06:26
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Peter West, 05:59
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, John Lumley, 04:43
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, John Lumley, 04:30
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Costello, Roger L., 04:11
January 13, 2014
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, John Lumley, 12:19
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Dimitre Novatchev, 09:16
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Wolfgang Laun, 09:08
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Michael Kay, 06:53
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Wolfgang Laun, 06:43
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Michael Kay, 06:14
- Re: [xsl] RE: Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Wolfgang Laun, 06:00
- [xsl] RE: Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Costello, Roger L., 04:36
January 12, 2014
- RE: [xsl] How to avoid adding defaulted attributes, Lizzi, Vincent, 19:43
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Michael Kay, 18:24
- Re: [xsl] How to avoid adding defaulted attributes, Mark Giffin, 18:23
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Dimitre Novatchev, 17:36
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Dimitre Novatchev, 15:38
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Dimitre Novatchev, 15:35
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Andrew Welch, 15:11
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Wendell Piez, 14:58
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Michael Kay, 13:28
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Dimitre Novatchev, 11:00
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, David Carlisle, 07:28
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Andrew Welch, 05:34
- Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, David Carlisle, 05:19
- [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Costello, Roger L., 05:10
- Re: [xsl] How to avoid adding defaulted attributes, Ihe Onwuka, 00:34
January 10, 2014
- Re: [xsl] For-each adds whitespace per iteration: why?, Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex, 16:18
- Re: [xsl] For-each adds whitespace per iteration: why?, Liam R E Quin, 16:17
- Re: [xsl] For-each adds whitespace per iteration: why?, Eliot Kimber, 16:11
- Re: [xsl] For-each adds whitespace per iteration: why?, Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex, 16:03
- Re: [xsl] For-each adds whitespace per iteration: why?, Eliot Kimber, 14:56
- Re: [xsl] For-each adds whitespace per iteration: why?, Eliot Kimber, 13:00
- Re: [xsl] For-each adds whitespace per iteration: why?, David Carlisle, 11:33
- Re: [xsl] For-each adds whitespace per iteration: why?, Michael Kay, 11:27
- Re: [xsl] For-each adds whitespace per iteration: why?, Wendell Piez, 11:21
- [xsl] For-each adds whitespace per iteration: why?, Eliot Kimber, 11:06
- Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, David Carlisle, 10:39
- RE: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Costello, Roger L., 10:33
- Re: [xsl] How to avoid adding defaulted attributes, Wendell Piez, 09:03
- Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Michael Kay, 08:37
- Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, davep, 08:11
- Re: [xsl] How to avoid adding defaulted attributes, Ihe Onwuka, 06:57
- Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, David Carlisle, 06:49
- Re: [xsl] How to avoid adding defaulted attributes, David Carlisle, 06:43
- Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Michael Kay, 06:01
- Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Andrew Welch, 05:01
- Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Costello, Roger L., 04:56
- Re: [xsl] How to avoid adding defaulted attributes, Ihe Onwuka, 04:31
- Re: [xsl] How to avoid adding defaulted attributes, David Carlisle, 04:29
- Re: [xsl] How to avoid adding defaulted attributes, Ihe Onwuka, 02:22
- Re: [xsl] How to avoid adding defaulted attributes, Michael Kay, 02:16
January 09, 2014
- [xsl] New pricing for XSLT, XSL-FO, UBL and code list classes in Australia, G. Ken Holman, 21:59
- Re: [xsl] How to avoid adding defaulted attributes, Martin Holmes, 19:49
- Re: [xsl] How to avoid adding defaulted attributes, Graydon, 19:12
- [xsl] How to avoid adding defaulted attributes, Mark Giffin, 18:53
- Re: [xsl] Including node in group when grouping key is null, Wendell Piez, 11:11
- Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Michael Kay, 05:21
- Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Tony Graham, 05:14
- Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Michael Kay, 05:13
- Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Andrew Welch, 05:07
- Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Costello, Roger L., 04:52
- Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, David Carlisle, 04:49
- Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Martin Honnen, 04:44
- Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Costello, Roger L., 04:37
- Re: [xsl] Including node in group when grouping key is null, Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex, 01:16
- [xsl] Including node in group when grouping key is null, Steve Fogel, 01:12
January 08, 2014
- [xsl] Classes in XML, XSLT/XPath, Advanced XSLT, Schematron, Tommie Usdin, 13:08
- Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, David Carlisle, 07:06
- Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Costello, Roger L., 06:59
- Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Michael Kay, 06:53
- Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, David Carlisle, 06:51
- Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Costello, Roger L., 06:41
- Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Michael Kay, 05:54
- Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, David Carlisle, 05:54
- Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Costello, Roger L., 05:41
- Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Tony Graham, 05:21
- Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, David Carlisle, 05:05
- Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, David Carlisle, 04:58
- Re: [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Tony Graham, 04:49
- [xsl] General rule for designing XPath expressions to return items in document order?, Costello, Roger L., 04:33
January 07, 2014
- Re: [xsl] Jeni Tennison, Vasu Chakkera, 19:23
- Re: [xsl] Xalan producing error - (Location of error unknown)org.xml.sax.SAXException: Can not resolve namespace prefix: #all, Graydon, 13:49
- Re: [xsl] Xalan producing error - (Location of error unknown)org.xml.sax.SAXException: Can not resolve namespace prefix: #all, a kusa, 13:43
- Re: [xsl] Xalan producing error - (Location of error unknown)org.xml.sax.SAXException: Can not resolve namespace prefix: #all, Graydon, 13:38
- Re: [xsl] Xalan producing error - (Location of error unknown)org.xml.sax.SAXException: Can not resolve namespace prefix: #all, Martin Holmes, 13:29
- Re: [xsl] Xalan producing error - (Location of error unknown)org.xml.sax.SAXException: Can not resolve namespace prefix: #all, Graydon, 13:26
- Re: [xsl] Xalan producing error - (Location of error unknown)org.xml.sax.SAXException: Can not resolve namespace prefix: #all, Martin Holmes, 13:13
- [xsl] Xalan producing error - (Location of error unknown)org.xml.sax.SAXException: Can not resolve namespace prefix: #all, a kusa, 13:09
January 05, 2014
- Re: [xsl] Designing streamable XPath expressions, Dimitre Novatchev, 21:35
- Re: [xsl] Designing streamable XPath expressions, Liam R E Quin, 20:49
- Re: [xsl] Designing streamable XPath expressions, Dimitre Novatchev, 20:34
- Re: [xsl] Designing streamable XPath expressions, Dimitre Novatchev, 20:27
- Re: [xsl] Designing streamable XPath expressions, Liam R E Quin, 20:27
- Re: [xsl] Designing streamable XPath expressions, Michael Kay, 17:42
- Re: [xsl] Designing streamable XPath expressions, Dimitre Novatchev, 15:52
- Re: [xsl] Designing streamable XPath expressions, Michael Kay, 15:51
- Re: [xsl] Designing streamable XPath expressions, Michael Kay, 15:16
- Re: [xsl] Designing streamable XPath expressions, Costello, Roger L., 15:16
- Re: [xsl] Saxon/C going forward, Jirka Kosek, 15:14
- Re: [xsl] Designing streamable XPath expressions, Michael Kay, 15:04
- Re: [xsl] Designing streamable XPath expressions, Costello, Roger L., 12:09
- Re: [xsl] Designing streamable XPath expressions, Dimitre Novatchev, 11:23
- [xsl] Designing streamable XPath expressions, Costello, Roger L., 04:24
January 03, 2014
- Re: [xsl] convert excel date to valid date format, henry human, 14:54
- Re: [xsl] convert excel date to valid date format, Wolfgang Laun, 09:19
- [xsl] convert excel date to valid date format, henry human, 07:54
- Re: [xsl] '"as" SequenceType' vs 'TypeDeclaration' in XPath 3.0?, Tony Graham, 06:59
- Re: [xsl] '"as" SequenceType' vs 'TypeDeclaration' in XPath 3.0?, Michael Kay, 06:46
- [xsl] '"as" SequenceType' vs 'TypeDeclaration' in XPath 3.0?, Tony Graham, 06:09
January 01, 2014
- [xsl] XSL-List Guidelines, Tommie Usdin, 10:48
- Re: [xsl] Jeni Tennison, Flynn, Peter, 10:18
- Re: [xsl] Jeni Tennison, Adam Retter, 06:41
- Re: [xsl] Jeni Tennison, Alexander Johannesen, 04:16
- [xsl] Jeni Tennison, Michael Kay, 03:34