Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?

xsl-list

Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?

2014-01-15 05:21:07

On 15/01/2014 11:16, David Carlisle wrote:

> .... (entire reply below the signature line, may not be shown at allin some mail readers)


Sorry about the formatting in that reply, I'm rather new at email...

David


________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is

powered by MessageLabs.________________________________________________________________________


--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, (continued) Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, davep Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Dimitre Novatchev Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Wendell Piez Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Michael Sokolov RE: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Costello, Roger L. Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Piotr Bański Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Dimitre Novatchev Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Piotr Bański Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Costello, Roger L. Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, David Carlisle Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, David Carlisle <= Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Costello, Roger L. Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, David Carlisle Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Wendell Piez Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Michael Kay Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Dimitre Novatchev Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Wendell Piez Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Dimitre Novatchev Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Wolfgang Laun

Previous by Date:	Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, David Carlisle
Next by Date:	Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex
Previous by Thread:	Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, David Carlisle
Next by Thread:	Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]