Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?

xsl-list

[Top] [All Lists]

<prev [Date] next>

<prev [Thread] next>

Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?

2014-01-14 15:49:39

from [Piotr Bański]

[Permanent Link]

But nodes don't nest, subtrees do. Those subtrees have minimally a rootnode, and are sometimes identified with that root node, metonymically.But to speak of a node nested inside another... urgle. Sounds wrongish.


Same thing about containment, of course.

Best,

  P.

On 14/01/14 22:20, Costello, Roger L. wrote:

I vote for "nested".

Sample usage:

        //x is a "crawling" expression - one that selects
        nodes which may nest inside one another.

/Roger

--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--



--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, (continued) Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Dimitre Novatchev Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Wolfgang Laun Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, davep Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Graydon Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Michael Kay Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, davep Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Dimitre Novatchev Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Wendell Piez Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Michael Sokolov RE: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Costello, Roger L. Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Piotr Bański <= Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Dimitre Novatchev Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Piotr Bański Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Costello, Roger L. Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, David Carlisle Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, David Carlisle Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Costello, Roger L. Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, David Carlisle Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Wendell Piez Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Michael Kay

Previous by Date:	RE: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Costello, Roger L.
Next by Date:	Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Dimitre Novatchev
Previous by Thread:	RE: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Costello, Roger L.
Next by Thread:	Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?, Dimitre Novatchev
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]