xsl-list
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [xsl] Does the count() function require access to the whole subtree?

2014-01-12 05:19:27
On 12/01/2014 11:10, Costello, Roger L. wrote:
A couple days ago Michael Kay wrote:

Inspection operations on an element are operations that can be
performed while positioned at the start tag.

Inspection operations include: count(), exists(), name().

Absorption operations are operations that require access to the whole
subtree.

Absorption operations include: string(), data(), xsl:value-of

Michael, doesn't the count() function require access to the whole
subtree? How would a count be conducted by sitting at the top of a
subtree? Perhaps you meant to say that the count() function is an
absorption operation?

/Roger


consider count(/) and string(/)

count() can return 1 straight away, whereas string() needs to process the entire tree below /.

David




--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--